Seite 5 von 5

Verfasst: So Dez 21, 2008 07:26
von MaLa
Ist Plattling nicht das Team, was in 2 Spielen von Darmstadt 70 Punkte kassiert hat, die zuvor grade mal 120 Punkte in 12 Spielen aufs Scoreboard brachten? Wozu brauchen die so Unmengen neue Offensivspieler, während sie defensiv nix neues vermelden? Wollen sie versuchen, alle Spiele mit 50:49 zu gewinnen? Intressante Taktik. Bezweifel allerdings dass sie damit gleich um den Südtitel mitspielen.

Verfasst: So Dez 21, 2008 08:10
von ILoveThisGame
There were 69 points scored against Plattling last season in 2 relegation games, however not all were Defensive points. Game 1, Darmstadt scored on a short field after a Plattling fumble, and game 2 Darmstadt's Defense took a tipped ball for a TD, and they returned a KO for TD verses reserves at the end of the game. The mighty Marburg gave up 3 TD's to Darmstadt at the beginning of the season, Weinheim also.

In 2008, Plattling's strength on defense was their weakness as well - it was size and speed. No doubt, they were the fastest defense in the GFL2 South, but they were also the smallest (or one of, I didn't see Konningsbrunn or SSA play last season).

One of the coaching job's of the year last season was on Plattling's Defense - imagine what that staff can do with people playing their normal positions this season. Sure, losing Butler will hurt, but secondary is still a strength in Plattling. Game 1 verses Darmstadt confirms Texican's assessment a good QB and good receivers (Darmstadt's receivers were great game 1, especially my hated nemesis Leland Brickus) will kill a defensive secondary every time, and I am not sure that Darius Outlaw even got dirty with the lack of pass rush game 1, he, like Hazel, could have smoked a fine Cuban cigar back there with all the time they had game 1!

Winning games 50-49 - JUST WIN BABY, another reason you need to go and see "the greatest show on grass" play when they are in your neighborhood! :lol: