Ab 2012:
Jeder Verein, dem am Tackle Erwachsenenspielbetrieb der Männer mit einer Mannschaft teilnimmt, muss eine Jugendmannschaft im Spielbetrieb nachweisen. Dem Verein steht es dabei frei, in welcher Alters- oder Leistungsklasse oder ob im Tackle- oder Flag-Football er diese Pflicht erfüllt.
Für neugegründete Vereine oder Vereine, die nach einer Pause eine Erwachsenenmannschaft wieder anmelden, besteht einen Karenzzeit von zwei Jahren ab Aufnahme des Spielbetriebs in einer Liga. Die Teilnahme in einer Aufbauliga wird bei dieser Regelung nicht als Spielbetrieb angesehen.
Ebenfalls in diesem Passus, Seite 31:
Der zuständige Landesverband hat die Pflicht die Lizenz zu verweigern bzw. zu entziehen, wenn der Verein nicht in der Lage ist zu beweisen, daß er aktive Jugendarbeit betreibt.
Dies steht aber im Zusammenhang mit den Regelungen für die Regionalliga, wobei unser Verband (RLP!) auf Anfrage mitgeteilt hat, daß es für alle Ligenklassen der Herren gilt!
Eigentl. dürfte das damit eindeutig sein
... zumindest für mich
promoting the sport by *supporting* teams that have a youth team is good.
It seems however, that the rules mentioned above directly penalize a team that does not have a youth team.
How will this affect the sport overall? Not in a direct positive way.
Imagine a GFL team that just happens to have their youth players leave for a season.
Would they just "buy" new youth players by mis-appropriating the funds from their GFL team?
If they could not gather enough players, and could not find a youth team to have a cooperative season with, then that GFL team is then banned for the season?
What repercussions does that have for the team?
Sponsors revoking their sponsorship status and demanding money back?
The following season, the former GFL team would be forced to start in the Landesliga again or not?
Why would they acknowledge that its a "randsportart" and then penalize teams that do not have enough youth to participate?
Where do they draw the line?
Is it valid to have a single team in which each football team in germany enlists 1 single youth player as a "cooperative" team?
I am not thinking about our own team here, but about other teams trying to build up a sports program that will effectively be prevented from doing so due to rules such as these. Sure they have their "Karrenzeiten" and even the GFL teams that by whatever unfortunate circumstance are cut from the season due to this can still play in the Aufbauliga....
Good intentions, but overall very poorly implemented.
Never judge a person until you have walked a mile in their shoes. Then you are a mile away AND you have their shoes.
Parker hat geschrieben:
...
Good intentions, but overall very poorly implemented.
I agree. Naturally any team will desire to have a youth team simply for the sake of finding and raising new players.
No team, regardless of which league they play in, will be able to sustain themselves in the long run without being replenished with new players vertically or horizontally.
I would have expected that the requirements for youth teams be directly linked to the level of the senior team. Meaning the farther up the leagues you go, the more the requirements scale with.
TheTank hat geschrieben:
I would have expected that the requirements for youth teams be directly linked to the level of the senior team. Meaning the farther up the leagues you go, the more the requirements scale with.
That would have been a very good idea to have implemented.
Never judge a person until you have walked a mile in their shoes. Then you are a mile away AND you have their shoes.
so nimmer lang, dann wissen wir endlich mehr, wer wo spielt und wie die liga aufgebaut ist. kann es kaum erwarten, dass es wieder heisst gameday. dabei ist es noch so lange hin....
great job afvd...
There will be no Verbandsliga next year.
Verbandsliga is being renamed to Landesliga.
No one has to move down from the Oberliga.
Two teams get to move up from the former Landesliga.
wtf are they thinking??
Never judge a person until you have walked a mile in their shoes. Then you are a mile away AND you have their shoes.
