TOUCHDOWN...
-
- OLiner
- Beiträge: 341
- Registriert: Mi Okt 26, 2005 17:44
- Wohnort: Karl-Marx-Stadt
- Kontaktdaten:
TOUCHDOWN...
... und nun? Sicher hat der eine oder andere einen solchen schon gemacht. Aber was, wenn man in der Endzone steht? Spiken - verboten, Gesten zum Gegner - verboten, Mitspieler "abschießen" - verboten...
Was kann man denn nun stylisch/geilisch tun, ohne dass die Refs eine Flagge werfen?
Was kann man denn nun stylisch/geilisch tun, ohne dass die Refs eine Flagge werfen?
- musketeer54
- Linebacker
- Beiträge: 2077
- Registriert: So Apr 11, 2004 04:34
also was ich persönlich sehr geil fand bei uns in der jugend dieses jahr war die imitation der pupur kobras aus dodgeball(voll auf die nüsse)
im kreis aufstellen...2mal auf die beine klatschen und dann schön mit beiden händen die kobra zischen lassen!
gab auch nie ne strafe weils einfach nur lustig war und nur füns und ganz kurz!
im kreis aufstellen...2mal auf die beine klatschen und dann schön mit beiden händen die kobra zischen lassen!
gab auch nie ne strafe weils einfach nur lustig war und nur füns und ganz kurz!
Catch me if you can
Also eins könnte ihr mir glauben sollte ich jemals einen Touchdown machen, werde ich ein Bier in der Endzone trinken....
gibts dafür 15 ??
gibts dafür 15 ??
Du wirst niemals Gewinnen, wenn du nicht den Typen vor dir schlägst. Das Ergebnis auf der Anzeigetafel ist unwichtig. Das ist nur für die Fans. Du musst den Krieg gegen deinen Gegenspieler gewinnen. Du musst deinen Mann stehen.
Wie schon an anderer Stelle gepostet
When do touchdown celebrations go too far?
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, The, Apr 8, 2004 by RICK BRAUN
When do touchdown celebrations go too far?
By RICK BRAUN
Thursday, April 8, 2004
Green Bay -- Years back, the National Football League started fining players for excessive celebrations. For that, some folks suggested that NFL stood for No Fun League.
Nowadays, those celebrations would be considered tame.
And because of the new level to which some celebrations have risen, the NFL has decided it's time to crack down again. And this time the powers that be are getting serious.
Continue article
Advertisement
At the owners meetings last week, owners voted, 31-1, to assess a 15-yard unsportsmanlike conduct penalty for any choreographed celebration involving two or more players.
The new rule prohibits two or more players engaging in "prolonged, excessive, premeditated or choreographed celebrations."
A 15-yard penalty can decide a game. One game can decide a playoff berth. And a playoff berth earned is a possibility of winning it all.
But in announcing its new rule, the NFL might have opened a can of worms for itself.
Simply put, what's "excessive" or "prolonged" will be purely a subjective matter.
What's excessive to one game official might not be excessive to another.
Is it excessive for a wide receiver to celebrate a first down by pointing toward the goal line in the traditional "first-down" signal made by referees? Is it excessive to spin the ball on the ground after a big catch?
Are those acts of taunting? Maybe, maybe not. If those simple celebrations are taken out of the game, some of the natural exuberance will also be lost.
Now that's not to say the NFL didn't need to do something about what has become somewhat of an epidemic.
Two seasons ago, wide receiver Terrell Owens scored a touchdown for the San Francisco 49ers and then took a pen out of his sock, autographed the ball and handed it to a friend in the end zone stands. Later that season, Owens scored a touchdown against the Green Bay Packers and grabbed the pompoms of a 49er cheerleader and pretended he was a cheerleader for a moment.
Last year New Orleans receiver Joe Horn scored a touchdown and then went to the goal post, where he'd hidden a cell phone. Horn proceeded to make a mock phone call. Later that week he proceeded to pay a hefty fine.
Owens, in fact, might have started the need for the crackdown seasons ago when his post-touchdown celebration in Dallas included running to the middle of the field and spiking the ball on the Dallas star. When he did it again, he got nailed by Dallas safety George Teague, and a brawl broke out.
So where is the line? More important, where should it be?
First off, let's decide which of the past celebrations went over the top. And it's not really that hard to figure out.
Owens' "Sharpie" celebration and his Dallas "star stomp" crossed the line. Horn's cell phone call crossed the line and Owens' pompom routine didn't.
Why?
Simple. The Sharpie and cell phone celebrations involved props -- items not found as part of a football field or uniform. The routines were premeditated and the props were planted. Owens' actions in Dallas were meant to show up the Cowboys.
Maybe Owens' pompom routine was premeditated, but he didn't have to plant the props. And more likely it seemed to be more of a spontaneous celebration.
And that's the point here. Spontaneity is good. It's exuberance. It's fun. It's the Lambeau Leap in its early stages. It's what we like about the game.
Premeditated -- with props -- is bad. It's trying to draw attention to one's self. It's trying to show up the other team. It's what we don't like about the game.
So when the referees get around to handing out penalties and the league office gets around to handing out fines, here's hoping they allow the spontaneity. And here's hoping they stop the showing up of opponents, the incessant drawing of attention to one's self.
Some of us remember when spiking the football was a new thing. And then in the early '70s, Kansas City wide receiver Elmo Wright began preceding his spike with a high-stepping touchdown dance -- a sort- of running in place with the knees up.
Today, the Lambeau Leap isn't so much a spontaneous thing. But it's an exuberant celebration with the fans, for the fans in those front rows behind the end zones. And at times, two or three or more players join the touchdown scorer along the end zone walls.
So the mind wonders: Will a flag fly the next time a Packer player does a Lambeau Leap if he's joined by teammates?
If that happens, a great part of the game will be gone.
Copyright 2004 Journal Sentinel Inc. Note: This notice does not apply to those news items already copyrighted and received through wire services or other media
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved.
When do touchdown celebrations go too far?
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, The, Apr 8, 2004 by RICK BRAUN
When do touchdown celebrations go too far?
By RICK BRAUN
Thursday, April 8, 2004
Green Bay -- Years back, the National Football League started fining players for excessive celebrations. For that, some folks suggested that NFL stood for No Fun League.
Nowadays, those celebrations would be considered tame.
And because of the new level to which some celebrations have risen, the NFL has decided it's time to crack down again. And this time the powers that be are getting serious.
Continue article
Advertisement
At the owners meetings last week, owners voted, 31-1, to assess a 15-yard unsportsmanlike conduct penalty for any choreographed celebration involving two or more players.
The new rule prohibits two or more players engaging in "prolonged, excessive, premeditated or choreographed celebrations."
A 15-yard penalty can decide a game. One game can decide a playoff berth. And a playoff berth earned is a possibility of winning it all.
But in announcing its new rule, the NFL might have opened a can of worms for itself.
Simply put, what's "excessive" or "prolonged" will be purely a subjective matter.
What's excessive to one game official might not be excessive to another.
Is it excessive for a wide receiver to celebrate a first down by pointing toward the goal line in the traditional "first-down" signal made by referees? Is it excessive to spin the ball on the ground after a big catch?
Are those acts of taunting? Maybe, maybe not. If those simple celebrations are taken out of the game, some of the natural exuberance will also be lost.
Now that's not to say the NFL didn't need to do something about what has become somewhat of an epidemic.
Two seasons ago, wide receiver Terrell Owens scored a touchdown for the San Francisco 49ers and then took a pen out of his sock, autographed the ball and handed it to a friend in the end zone stands. Later that season, Owens scored a touchdown against the Green Bay Packers and grabbed the pompoms of a 49er cheerleader and pretended he was a cheerleader for a moment.
Last year New Orleans receiver Joe Horn scored a touchdown and then went to the goal post, where he'd hidden a cell phone. Horn proceeded to make a mock phone call. Later that week he proceeded to pay a hefty fine.
Owens, in fact, might have started the need for the crackdown seasons ago when his post-touchdown celebration in Dallas included running to the middle of the field and spiking the ball on the Dallas star. When he did it again, he got nailed by Dallas safety George Teague, and a brawl broke out.
So where is the line? More important, where should it be?
First off, let's decide which of the past celebrations went over the top. And it's not really that hard to figure out.
Owens' "Sharpie" celebration and his Dallas "star stomp" crossed the line. Horn's cell phone call crossed the line and Owens' pompom routine didn't.
Why?
Simple. The Sharpie and cell phone celebrations involved props -- items not found as part of a football field or uniform. The routines were premeditated and the props were planted. Owens' actions in Dallas were meant to show up the Cowboys.
Maybe Owens' pompom routine was premeditated, but he didn't have to plant the props. And more likely it seemed to be more of a spontaneous celebration.
And that's the point here. Spontaneity is good. It's exuberance. It's fun. It's the Lambeau Leap in its early stages. It's what we like about the game.
Premeditated -- with props -- is bad. It's trying to draw attention to one's self. It's trying to show up the other team. It's what we don't like about the game.
So when the referees get around to handing out penalties and the league office gets around to handing out fines, here's hoping they allow the spontaneity. And here's hoping they stop the showing up of opponents, the incessant drawing of attention to one's self.
Some of us remember when spiking the football was a new thing. And then in the early '70s, Kansas City wide receiver Elmo Wright began preceding his spike with a high-stepping touchdown dance -- a sort- of running in place with the knees up.
Today, the Lambeau Leap isn't so much a spontaneous thing. But it's an exuberant celebration with the fans, for the fans in those front rows behind the end zones. And at times, two or three or more players join the touchdown scorer along the end zone walls.
So the mind wonders: Will a flag fly the next time a Packer player does a Lambeau Leap if he's joined by teammates?
If that happens, a great part of the game will be gone.
Copyright 2004 Journal Sentinel Inc. Note: This notice does not apply to those news items already copyrighted and received through wire services or other media
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved.
- musketeer54
- Linebacker
- Beiträge: 2077
- Registriert: So Apr 11, 2004 04:34
Wäre Dir klar, wenn Du das Spiel gesehen hättest. Er hat so getan, als wäre der Ball eine Motorsäge, und hat damit das Fieldgoal "abgesägt"...
Aber mit allem drum und dran. Erst eine Hand ruckartig vom Ball weggezogen, als würde er zum Starten an der Leine ziehen, dann mit beiden Händen am Ball diesen zitternd am Pfosten entlanggezogen... Sah sehr geil aus.
Aber mit allem drum und dran. Erst eine Hand ruckartig vom Ball weggezogen, als würde er zum Starten an der Leine ziehen, dann mit beiden Händen am Ball diesen zitternd am Pfosten entlanggezogen... Sah sehr geil aus.
choreographien, sind asi, ich finds gut aber kanns verstehen, wenn die refs, oder der verband da was gegen haben. sachen wie ein first down move, den ball spiken oder sich nach nem TD freuen, sind total legitim, meiner meinung nach.
wenn das verboten wird, oder dadurch das es bereits verboten wurde geht dem football einiges verloren. Zum glück gibt es refs die es noch nciht so eng sehen.
wenn das verboten wird, oder dadurch das es bereits verboten wurde geht dem football einiges verloren. Zum glück gibt es refs die es noch nciht so eng sehen.
@ musketeer: achso, hatte das spiel auch nicht gesehen....sieht man aber von hinten auch überhaupt nicht....
geil war meiner meinung anch auch diese celebration, bei der der scorer so tut als wäre der ball ne handgranate....tut so als würde er den stift ziehen, wirft den ball weg und wenn der ball aufkommt, fallen alle um ^^
edit: findet ihr es hochnäsig, wenn man nach nem catch oder nem lauf mit ziemlich viel abstand zum gegner kurz vor der endzone ist und dann 50 cm vor der goal line anhält sich umdreht und sich rückwärt in die endzone fallen lässt?
wenn wir grad bei taunts sind, sau lustig und recht dreißt find ich auch thomas gurka...manchmal, wenn er den ball hat, selbst bei nem offtackle lauf, wenn mehrere spiel um ihn rum sind, hält er dem defender mit einer hand den ball hin wartet bis der zugreifen will und zieht ihn wieder weg und läuft weiter ^^
das sieht von der sideline recht geil aus...
geil war meiner meinung anch auch diese celebration, bei der der scorer so tut als wäre der ball ne handgranate....tut so als würde er den stift ziehen, wirft den ball weg und wenn der ball aufkommt, fallen alle um ^^
edit: findet ihr es hochnäsig, wenn man nach nem catch oder nem lauf mit ziemlich viel abstand zum gegner kurz vor der endzone ist und dann 50 cm vor der goal line anhält sich umdreht und sich rückwärt in die endzone fallen lässt?
wenn wir grad bei taunts sind, sau lustig und recht dreißt find ich auch thomas gurka...manchmal, wenn er den ball hat, selbst bei nem offtackle lauf, wenn mehrere spiel um ihn rum sind, hält er dem defender mit einer hand den ball hin wartet bis der zugreifen will und zieht ihn wieder weg und läuft weiter ^^
das sieht von der sideline recht geil aus...
Wenns ans verhöhnen des Gegners geht (und das tut es beim abbremsen, Ball raushalten, oder bei Gesten zum Gegner), kann ich das gar nicht. Dafür sitzt ein Spieler auch mal den Rest des Spiels draußen.
Wer keinen Respekt hat, spielt nicht.
Ich persönlich mag einstudierte "neutrale" Sachen auch nicht, verbiete sie in meinem Team auch immer.
Gonzos kleine "Zisch"-Nummer war mir aber egal, da die meisten die eh nie gesehen haben, wenn die mal 2 Leute im ganzen Jubel gemacht haben.
Aber mehr sollte es auch nicht sein.
Anders sieht es aus, wenn ich nen entscheidenden TD mache, und das Team jubelt einfach nur exzessiv (also länger, lauter, mit mehr Freude *g*), dann ist es mir recht (sofern nicht alle 22-50 Mann in der Endzone liegen).
Wer keinen Respekt hat, spielt nicht.
Ich persönlich mag einstudierte "neutrale" Sachen auch nicht, verbiete sie in meinem Team auch immer.
Gonzos kleine "Zisch"-Nummer war mir aber egal, da die meisten die eh nie gesehen haben, wenn die mal 2 Leute im ganzen Jubel gemacht haben.
Aber mehr sollte es auch nicht sein.
Anders sieht es aus, wenn ich nen entscheidenden TD mache, und das Team jubelt einfach nur exzessiv (also länger, lauter, mit mehr Freude *g*), dann ist es mir recht (sofern nicht alle 22-50 Mann in der Endzone liegen).